Southern Express Co. v. Hunnicutt & Turner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari, from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. December 16, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Suit on account, for materials furnished and work done, may be maintained although the agreement whereon the materials were furnished or the work was done be evidenced by a written contract. Chapman v. Conwell, 1 Ga. App. 212 (58 S. E. 137) ; Sparks Improvement Co. v. Jones, 4 Ga. App. 62 (60 S. E. 810) ; Johnson v. Quinn, 52 Ga. 485; Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co., 93 Ga. 599 (20 S. E. 44). This is especially true in a justice’s court, where technical pleading is not required. Ga. So. Ry. Co. v. Barfield, 1 Ga. App. 203 (58 S. E. 236) ; Southern Express Co. v. Briggs, 1 Ga. App. 294 (57 S. E.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Johnson v. QuinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Southern Express Co. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Chapman v. ConwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Watson v. Sierra Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Tanner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Jones v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909