Legal Opinion

Collins v. Barker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeierhenry, Justice

[¶ 1.] Neil E. Collins and Sharon K. Collins (Collins) brought an action against James Barker (Barker) claiming that weeds from his adjacent land blew onto their property causing damage to their fences, water supply and tree belt. Collins’ claim was based on theories of negligence, nuisance and trespass. The trial court ruled in favor of Barker. Collins appeal. We reverse.

Facts

[¶2.] Collins own a 160-acre farm in Butte County, South Dakota. The farm is surrounded on all sides by Barker’s property. The Collins reside on the property and raise horses for commercial purposes. Since their…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jasper v. JasperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lalley v. Safway Steel Scaffolds, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Atkinson v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Atkinson v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API