Legal Opinion

Clifton v. CHARLES E. BAINBRIDGE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1956No. 36940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Justice.

This is an appeal by Katherine Clifton from a verdict and judgment for the sum of $897.24, rendered against her in the District Court of Muskogee County in an action instituted !by Charles E. Bainbridge Company, Inc., to recover for damages to merchandise, men’s suits, caused by water leaking thereon while located in a leased portion of a two-story business building owned by defendant.

Plaintiff alleged that the defendant was obligated to keep the leased premises in repair and that the damage was caused by the failure and neglect of the defendant in allowing the roof and other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Werner v. KnollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Franklin Fire Insurance v. NollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Sunlight Carbon Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foland v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API