Legal Opinion
Becton v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 14, 2007No. 2:05-cv-1143PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Larry Becton filed suit against Defendant Starbucks Coffee Company to recover for injuries he sustained when hot coffee spilled, burning his hand, chest, and abdomen. Plaintiff asserts state law claims of negligence and products liability. The Court’s jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Record at 18), Defendant’s motion in limine to disregard the statements contained in paragraphs 4 and 5 of Becton’s affidavit,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Broughton v. Shoe Show, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Gordon v. B. Braun Medical Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020