Legal Opinion

M. Morgenthau-Seixas Co. v. Greene

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLydon, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The complaint, in substance, is that plaintiff was employed by third persons to effect a sale of their real property. For its services plaintiff was to receive the regular brokerage from the owners. Plaintiff was later employed by defendant as a broker and was authorized to submit offers for the property on his behalf. This double employment was known to both parties to the ensuing transaction. Plaintiff did submit an offer, and an agreement upon the terms of a sale was arrived at between defendant and the owners. Defendant later…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allan Fox Co. v. WohlNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giovannoni v. Waple & James, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Duross Co. v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API