Pollock v. Pope
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Appellee submits a motion to dismiss this appeal upon the theory that appellants, assigning errors here, show no right to appeal, or that they have not sustained any legal injury, and argue to the effect that these appellants were not proper or necessary parties to the cause, and that the same should have been continued in the name of the surviving partner, Bernheimer. There was no demurrer taking the point that these parties were not proper or necessary parties to the cause, nor is the decree overruling the motion to strike the bill of reviver here sought by respondent to be reviewed. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hertzler v. StevensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Thompson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Thweatt v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amann v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Phillips v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Burt v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.