Legal Opinion

Watkins v. National Electric Products Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 30, 1948No. 9383PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendant in the District Court for injuries sustained by alleged negligence of the defendant by not providing a safe place for him to work in that it failed to remove noxious fumes or provide personal protective devices. Such failure is a violation of the Pennsylvania Factory Act of 1937.1 Jurisdiction •of the Federal Court is based on diversity of citizenship and the entire question is one of Pennsylvania law. It is our humble function to determine, as best we can, what ■a Pennsylvania court would say under similar circumstances.

At the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Urian v. Scranton Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Moffett v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Fritsch v. Pennsylvania Golf ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Plaugher v. American Viscose Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Hotels Ass'n v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. National Zinc Company v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. State v. WeaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Rohner v. Fox ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Kelly v. Eclipse Motor LineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API