State v. Reisig
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of nine counts of possession of altered property, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2306, and was sentenced to time served in jail, the court having elected to treat the offenses as misdemeanors. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in rejecting his attack on the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 13-2306 and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions. We find no merit in his position but reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment of guilt on one count only.
A.R.S. § 13-2306, as it read at the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stephens v. Textron, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Willie D. King, Fred Lee Jones and Tellis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ex Parte RubinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- People v. NevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
3Cited by14 opinions
- McInturff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FillmoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Sanchez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Sanchez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Horsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.