Legal Opinion
FRANKIE VON HOLT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 21, 2020No. CR-17-241PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2020 Ark. 205
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-17-241 FRANKIE VON HOLT Opinion Delivered: May 21, 2020 PETITIONER V. PRO SE PETITION TO FILE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR STATE OF ARKANSAS CORAM NOBIS IN THE CIRCUIT RESPONDENT COURT [SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT, NO. 66FCR-15-1380] PETITION DENIED. RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Frankie Von Holt1 petitions this court for permission to file a writ of error coram nobis in the trial court. We deny his petition because it contains no allegations of trial error that are grounds for error coram nobis relief. Von Holt…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Martinez-Marmol v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- McCullough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Christopher Newton White v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
- Von Holt v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020