Legal Opinion

Troxler v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the same action in which there was a former trial and appeal, reported in 122 N.C. 902. The plaintiff was a brakeman on a through freight train of the defendant company, and by direction of the conductor undertook to couple two cars, which were not furnished with automatic couplers. He used first a stick, and failing with that, used his hand, but in the effort, owing to the rebound, his hand got caught between the deadlocks and was so badly crushed that it had to be amputated.

In the light of the former trial his Honor declined to submit an issue as to whether the plaintiff was injured…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cone v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Lloyd v. P. H. Hanes & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Mason v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Grant v. Graham Chero-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Witsell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coley v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Knight v. WingateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Elmore v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Blum v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. McGinn v. McCormickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API