Legal Opinion
Estate of Supeck
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1990No. C008412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Appellants Nick Supeck and James F. Supeck filed a petition in the trial court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1355 (hereafter section 1355) 1 to claim the escheated estate of George Supeck. Nick Supeck is the decedent’s brother; James F. Supeck is the decedent’s nephew.
After the petition was filed and the five-year statute of limitations prescribed by section 1355 had expired, petitioners’ attorney learned of the existence and whereabouts of decedent’s surviving daughter, Dolores Newman, who had not filed a section 1355 petition.
Despite the fact that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Estate of CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mundt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Education v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Estate of McGuiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Desmond v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- McDonald v. Treasurer of VirginiaRichmond County Circuit Court · 1991
- Board of Education v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.