Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cherokee. Tried before Hon. J. A. Bilbro.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The defendant and Jane Ray were indicted for living together in a state of adultery or fornication. Only the defendant was arrested and put upon trial for the offense, his co-defendant having escaped. The court did not err in ordering a severance and proceeding with the trial of the defendant. — Woodley v. The State, 103 Ala. 23 ; Marler v. The State, 67 Ala. 55.

Evidence having been offered by the State tending to show acts of adulterous intercourse within twelve months *61before the finding of the indictment, there was no error in receiving evidence of similar acts prior to that time. Such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Billingsley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Linton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Woodley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Lide v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Dickens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. West Pratt Coal Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API