Sprinkle v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The substance of count A of the complaint is that, “while plaintiff was standing by the side of defendant’s track,” within reach of the open swinging doors of a refrigerator car in a passing train, he was stricken and injured by one of those doors, and that this resulted proximately from the negligence of defendant’s servants or agents, while acting within the line of their employment, in that they “negligently failed to use all the means at their command to prevent said door from striking plaintiff after becoming aware of plaintiff’s peril of being struck by said door, when by the use of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Grauer v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Birmingham Railway & Electric Co v. FranscombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. WoolvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- First National Bank of Mobile v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Capitol Motor Lines, Inc. v. BillingsleaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.