Legal Opinion
Walters v. City of Redondo Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 21, 2016No. 2d Civil B258638PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerren, J.
*813 Respondent City of Redondo Beach (City) approved a conditional use permit (CUP) for construction of a combination car wash and coffee shop on a vacant lot adjacent to homes owned by appellants Steven Walters, Mark Kleiman, Rick Son, Krishna Gorripati and John Moore. In issuing the permit, the City found the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq. ; CEQA) 1 because it involves the development of "new, small facilities or structures [and] installation of small new equipment and facilities in small…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Marriage of CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- World Bus. Acad. v. Cal. State Lands Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McCorkle Eastside Neighborhood Grp. v. City of St. Helena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Anderson v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Concerned Citizens of Beverly Hills etc. v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Concerned Citizens of Beverly Hills/Bel Air v. City of Beverly Hills CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.