Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1952No. 4208_1Published

1ConcurrenceHuxman, Circuit Judge

(concurring specially.)

I concur in Judge Bratton’s opinion and in the judgment of the majority, but, in addition to what is said therein, wish to further amplify my views with respect to the rights of public figures under the Utah statute.

General statements are found in many cases arising under the common law, as well as in some of the cases arising under the statute of New York, to the effect that one who enters the public arena and thereby becomes a public figure waives his right of privacy, and by implication inferring that a different rule is to be applied in the case of one not in the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API