Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Doris Duke Foundation - Shangri-La Museum of Islamic Art

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 2, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00383Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I ROSE A. BUCHANAN, Case No. 24-cv-00383-DKW-WRP Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH vs. LIMITED LEAVE TO AMEND1 DORIS DUKE FOUNDATION – SHANGRI-LA MUSEUM, et al., Defendants. On September 11, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff Rose Buchanan leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed her Complaint against Defendant Doris Duke Foundation – Shangri-La Museum with leave to amend because she failed to plausibly state a claim for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Dkt.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API