Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS M. SALAS RAZO, on his own behalf of ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0172 JLT HBK and all others similarly situated, ) 12 ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Plaintiff, ) PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ) SETTLEMENT v. ) 14 ) (Doc. 72) AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, and ) 15 DOES 1 through 100 ) ) 16 Defendants. ) ) 17 18 Luis Salas Razo asserts AT&T Mobility Services failed to comply with California’s wage and 19 hour laws by failing to pay all wages due and provide proper meal and rest breaks. Razo now seeks 20…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.