Legal Opinion

Jones v. Ragsdale.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 24, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ActxoN to recover land by Carl M. Jones against W. G. Ragsdale, heard upon a case agreed, by Judge G. S. Ferguson, at the February Term, 1906, of the Superior Court of GuilKoed. The court gave judgment for defendant and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

Tbe facts agreed upon and pertinent to. the controversy are as follows: On the 19th day of December, 1882, Alexander W. Robbins conveyed to “Zilphia S. Jones and her heirs by her present husband, levy Jones, the land in controversy * * * to have and to hold the said land and appurtenances thereunto belonging, to the said Zilphia Jones and her heirs by her present husband, and assigns to her only use and behoof.”

That at the date of the execution of this deed, Zilphia Jones was the wife of levy Jones and they had one living child, levy Edgar Jones; and thereafter, to-wit, on November 14, 1883,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marsh v. Griffin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sessoms v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Perrett v. . BirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Hartman v. . FlynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Morehead v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API