Tulsa Cotton Oil Co. v. Ratley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Tulsa. County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Clarence Ratley against the Tulsa Cotton Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER. C.
Clarence Rat-ley sued in the superior court of Tulsa county the Tulsa Cotton Oil Company to recover damages for the injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant.
It is alleged: That the plaintiff on the day said suit was filed was an infant. 15 years of age, and that one Lena Y. Rounds was his mother and instituted this suit as his n°xt friend. That on the 10th of November, 1913, the said Clarence Ratley was working for said company under a contract of employment, having been at the time of his injury an inexperienced child only 15 years of age.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. ArmentrautIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Inland Steel Co. v. YedinakIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Huffman v. Oklahoma Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Angelly Ex Rel. AngellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Secklich v. Harris-Emery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Teel v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Angelly Ex Rel. AngellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956