Commonwealth v. Lednum
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.
Today we hold that natural gas, as used here, is a dangerous weapon. As such, the defendant was properly convicted.
Facts. A day before Christmas, 2004, the defendant, Cedric R. Lednum, learned that his wife was seeking a divorce. He reacted by informing her that he was going to quit his job and resume smoking. Given his history of drinking, substance abuse, and verbal violence, his “bizarre” tone during the conversation *723frightened his wife, prompting her to change the locks on the house.
Three days later, on December 27, 2004, at approximately 5:30 a.m., the defendant called his wife and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ApplebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FarrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. TarrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GorassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. TevlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AriasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. FullardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011