Legal Opinion

Murray v. Cromwell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1975No. 35707PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORWIN D. HOUSER, Special Judge.

The question is the propriety of an order of the circuit court allowing Robert E. Murray an attorney’s fee of $5,800 for services rendered Janice Joy Yadon, executrix of the Estate of Charles A. Cromwell, Deceased. Charles A. Cromwell, Jr., as successor executor, asserts error in finding that claimant was entitled to any fee for his services in connection with the estate; claims that the attorney “improperly advised the executrix of the estate with regard to her ability to sell corporate stock which was an asset of the estate, causing direct economic loss to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Public Works of Rolla v. Sho-Me Power Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Farrar v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Eisiminger v. StantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Estate of MunzertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Matter of Estate of FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Lowe v. Brajkovic (In Re Brajkovic)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1993
  5. Estate of Lemaster v. HackleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API