Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1967No. 8619PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

The capacity to sue, be sued, or be a party appellant or respondent, reposes only in persons in being. 67 C.J.S. Parties §§ 6 and 30. Without being advised when the event occurred, the Notice of Appeal herein states one of the appellants is “now deceased.” A continued reading hereof will reveal this, unfortunately, is the least of our problems.

Item one of the acutely abridged transcript given us concerns some undisclosed cause of action resulting in a default judgment entered August 19, 1963, by the Magistrate Court of Butler County in favor of the plaintiff-respondent, Tommy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. McCoy v. BriegelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. EC Robinson Lumber Company v. LowreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. LowderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. City of Phoenix v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re the Marriage of WoffordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Page v. PageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. In Re the Marriage of NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Capoferri v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API