Legal Opinion

(PC) Brown v. Arnold

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 26, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00697Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM ODESSA BROWN, II, No. 2:19-cv-00697-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 E. ARNOLD, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 19

636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Since plaintiff has submitted a 21 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a),…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API