Norton v. Pilger
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Madison county. Tried below before Crawford, J. cited: Auliman v. Mallory, 5 Neb., 180; Blank v. Kelley, 9 Id., 441; McCormick v. Stevenson, 13 Id., 72; Gorham v. Holden, 9 At. Rep., 894; Germain v. Wind, 13 Pac. Rep., 753; Miles v. Edsall, 14 Pac. Rep., 701; McGinnis v. Savage, 1 S. E. Rep., 746; Campbell P. P. & M. Co. v. Walker, 1 So.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Madison county. Tried below before Crawford, J. cited: Auliman v. Mallory, 5 Neb., 180; Blank v. Kelley, 9 Id., 441; McCormick v. Stevenson, 13 Id., 72; Gorham v. Holden, 9 At. Rep., 894; Germain v. Wind, 13 Pac. Rep., 753; Miles v. Edsall, 14 Pac. Rep., 701; McGinnis v. Savage, 1 S. E. Rep., 746; Campbell P. P. & M. Co. v. Walker, 1 So. Rep., 59: Faetli v. Leary, 23 Neb., 270; Loeb v. .Milner, 32 N. W. Rep., 209; McConnell v. People, 84 111., 585; Sirrine v. Briggs, 31 Mich., 444. cited: Heryford v. Davis 102 U* S., 235; Everett v. Buchanan, 2 Dak., 249;…
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
The plaintiffs below brought their action in replevin on April 30, 1887, in the district court of Madison county, alleging that they are the owners and entitled to the immediate possession of all the machinery, presses, type, ■and printing material of the Norfolk Printing Company, not incorporated; that the defendants wrongfully detain the same, and have so detained the said goods and chattels for two days, to the plaintiff’s damage $1,200.
The defendants Norton, Sprecher, and Bell answered by a general denial.
There was a trial to a jury, with verdict for the plaintiffs, that the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- De Crette v. MohlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Campbell Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Richardson Drug Co. v. TeasdallNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Sanford v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896