Legal Opinion
Arthur Mares v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1967No. 9346_1PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Arthur Mares and Albert Mares were jointly indicted for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) by the robbery of a federally insured savings and loan association in the course of which they put lives in jeopardy by the use of a pistol. On the motion of the government, separate trials were held with Arthur being tried first. Both were found guilty. We are concerned here with the appeal of Arthur. A separate opinion filed this day, 10 Cir., 383 F.2d 811, disposes of the appeal of Albert.
The evidence was entirely circumstantial. It is well summarized in the opinion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Andrew TsanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.