Legal Opinion
United States v. General Dynamics Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1966No. 62 Civ. 3686PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
The court finds that the plaintiff, United States of America, has proven by the fair preponderance of the credible evidence, that the defendant, General Dynamics Corporation, has violated the provisions of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 (1914), as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18 (1958) , 1 Moreover, the government has proven that the merger agreement is violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209 (1890), as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1958). 2 It has failed to prove the Section 1 charge with reference to alleged contracts on condition made with certain of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Columbia Nitrogen Corporation v. Royster CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- The Great Escape, Inc. v. Union City Body Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- David Devoto and Charles F. Volk v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Company and Bankers Mortgage Company of Calif.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.