Legal Opinion
Kammueller v. Loomis, Fargo & Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 15, 2003No. 0:02-cv-00615PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Loomis, Fargo & Co. (“Loomis”), is an armored car company. Among its other services, Loomis transports United States currency. Plaintiff, Mac Kammueller, worked for Loomis 1 in various capacities for approximately 30 years. After Loomis terminated his employment, plaintiff brought this suit alleging violations of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). See Minn.Stat. 363.03, subds. l(2)(b)-(c), 1(6) (2002). Specifically, plaintiff charges defendant with disability discrimination and failure to accommodate his disability. This case is before the Court on…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Husinga v. Federal-Mogul Ignition Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007