Legal Opinion
Forton v. Laszar
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 2001No. 116871, COA No. 215488PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
622 N.W.2d 61 (2001)
463 Mich. 969
Robert FORTON and Marilyn Forton, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Michael LASZAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 116871, COA No. 215488.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
February 16, 2001.
On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs as amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal from the February 22, 2000, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
2Concurrence · CorriganCorrigan, C.J.
I join in the order denying leave to appeal only because defendant's most compelling…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Kelly; Concurrence · Cavanagh.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Forton v. LaszarMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. GronewaldMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
4Cited by12 opinions
- Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Michigan Education Ass'n v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co., Inc. v. DaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.