State v. Dowell
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
The question here is whether a person arrested for an alleged parole violation has a right to have the proceedings against him dismissed with prejudice when the arresting officer does not take him “before a magistrate without unnecessary delay for an initial appearance” as required by § 908.2, The Code. We granted discretionary review of a magistrate’s order overruling defendant David James Dowell’s motion to dismiss alleging such a right. We affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. An information charging defendant with parole violation for changing his address without…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Mathison v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Hackett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.