Legal Opinion

State v. Dowell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 17, 1980No. 62727PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

The question here is whether a person arrested for an alleged parole violation has a right to have the proceedings against him dismissed with prejudice when the arresting officer does not take him “before a magistrate without unnecessary delay for an initial appearance” as required by § 908.2, The Code. We granted discretionary review of a magistrate’s order overruling defendant David James Dowell’s motion to dismiss alleging such a right. We affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. An information charging defendant with parole violation for changing his address without…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. State v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Mathison v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Hackett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API