Legal Opinion
Stillwell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 5, 2014No. 1:11-vv-00077PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vaccine Act; Vaccine Injury; Motion for Review; ADEM; Diagnosis; Influenza; Flu Vaccination; Preponderance of Evidence
OPINION
Block, Judge.
This case is before the court on a motion to review (“Pet’r’s Mot.”) then Chief Special Master (“CSM”) Campbell-Smith’s decision to dismiss petitioner’s claim for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (the “Vaccine Program” or “Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l to -34, which provides compensation to individuals who can establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they have suffered “a vaccine-related injury.” §…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Broekelschen v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- D'Angiolini v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Bailey Jr v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Balasco v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Berenji v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Braun v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.