Legal Opinion

People v. Newman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1971No. Crim. 15444PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Following trial by jury, defendant was convicted of possessing a restricted dangerous drug for the purpose of sale, as proscribed by Health and Safety Code section 11911. On appeal, defendant urges reversal on the grounds that there was no substantial evidence to support the verdict, that an instruction on specific intent should have been given, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We have concluded that defendant’s conviction must be reversed for failure to instruct the jury with regard to the intent necessary to constitute a violation of section 11911.

In…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API