Legal Opinion

Petit v. Blenkiron

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1936No. Civ. 10747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

On June 25, 1926, defendants William Blenkiron and Frederick C. Wolter executed two promissory notes, one in the sum of $16;500 in favor of Title Guarantee and Trust Company, due three years after date; the other in the sum of $40,000 in favor of Joseph N. Hanson and Helen M. Hanson, due five years after date. This latter note, upon which a payment of $10,000 was subsequently made, was assigned to the plaintiffs and is the subject of the present action. On the same day and as a part of the same transaction, these two defendants executed a declaration of trust in the nature of a subdivision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Younger v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Reynolds v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Doane v. California Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  4. Withers v. BousfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Cortelyou v. VogelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ware v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Bratcher v. BucknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. McAdoo & Neblett v. F. P. Newport Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Witchell v. LondonoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API