Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 16, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

This is a suit to set aside as fraudulent a conveyance executed by the husband, C. C. Baldwin, to his wife, Mary Baldwin, and to have said lands sold and the proceeds applied to the payment of the complainant’s judgment of $170.78 and a store account of $80.13 against C. C. Baldwin.

The defendant O. C. Baldwin answered and denied that the conveyance was fraudulent, and alleged that his wife had paid a valuable and sufficient consideration for the land, and that at the time the conveyance was made he did not owe the complainant. He pleaded laches on the part of the complainant in attacking the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helm v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Hartnett v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  3. Dunn v. EatonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Farmers Bank of Lynchburg v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Robertson v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hyman v. Porter (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
  2. Sasaki v. KaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Nashville Milk Producers, Inc. v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  4. Scarborough v. PickensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Jack Charles Blankenship v. Donal CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API