Legal Opinion

Smith v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1884PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The defendant was register of deeds of Calhoun county in 1874 and 1875, and was sued by plaintiff in an action of trespass on the case. The declaration contains three counts. The second count is the only one upon which a recovery can be supported, and it states that on November 15, 1875, one John J. Lovett was the owner in fee of certain land, describing it, and that there were three certain mortgages upon it at that time, which the pleader numbers one, two and three, and states the parties, dates of mortgage, and time and place of the recording of the same, respectively; that they were all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Gardner v. HearttNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Batterson v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chase v. HeaneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Clark v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Trowell v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Ctrs., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Bridgeport Airport, Inc. v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. BLUE CROSS AND SHIELD OF MICH. v. FolkemaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API