Legal Opinion

Bell v. Duplessis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1963No. 809PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

150 So.2d 114 (1963)

Samuel H. BELL et al.

v.

Wilfred DUPLESSIS or Duplesses.

No. 809.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

February 4, 1963.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1963.

Benjamin Washastrom, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

A. J. Marciante, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before REGAN, YARRUT and SAMUEL, JJ.

SAMUEL, Judge.

This is a suit for property damages resulting from an automobile collision. The driver of one of the automobiles involved and his collision insurer are joint plaintiffs. Defendant, the driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident, has answered denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noonan v. London Guarantee and Accident CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Gallioto v. ChisholmLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Liddell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Smith v. BorchersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bordelon v. Audubon Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Scott v. GlazerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Barrois v. NotoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Messana v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Musco v. General Guaranty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Legendre v. RodrigueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API