Ex Parte Martin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus in which the applicant, an attorney and officer of the court, seeks relief from a judgment holding him in contempt of the 124th Judicial District Court of Gregg County. 1 We must order the applicant discharged because the record does not establish a show cause order was served on him for the purpose of providing him with reasonable notice of the specific charges against him, a minimum requisite of due process of law.
Article 1911a, V.A.C.S., requires that an officer of the court held in contempt shall upon proper notice…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CONTEMPT IN STATE v. DewerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Ex Parte MurphyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte AvilaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex parte CooperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte MurphyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.