Legal Opinion

Bearden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1967No. A-14051PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIX, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in Error, Arthur Bearden, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information in the County Court of Caddo County, Oklahoma with the offense of “intentionally, wilfully, and unlawfully driving, operating and'being in actual physical control .of a. motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor”. He was tried by a jury, found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine of $300.00, and 30 days in the County Jail. From that judgment and sentence he has appealed to this Court alleging numerous assignments of error.

It will not be necessary for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. SmelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. In Re Conduct of HassenstabOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Harris v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API