Legal Opinion

A. L. Webb & Sons v. Hicks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PbtitioN to rehear dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtEueches, J.

This is a petition by defendant to rehear a case heard at the September Term, 1898, of this Court, and reported in 123 N. 0., 244; and by the order of the Justice granting the petition, the rehearing is restricted to the statute of limitations.

The same case, or a case between the same parties, and for the recovery of the same claim, had been before this Court. at February Term, 1895, (116 N. C., 598). That appeal was brought to this Court by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the action; and, upon the hearing in this Court, the judgment of the court below dismissing the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. . WoodleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Pugh v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
  3. Wharton v. Commissioners of CurrituckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. A. L. Webb & Sons v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. A. L. Webb & Sons v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rowland Ex Rel. Messer v. BeauchampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Boudreaux v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. CriscoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Woodcock v. Bostic.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Blades v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API