Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Sheets

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1990No. Record 890179PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Russell

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of an insured against an insurer. The insurer relied on two exclusionary clauses in the contract of insurance in refusing to pay the claim. We must decide whether the trial court correctly held those clauses inapplicable.

In 1982, Hunt Contracting Corporation (Hunt), a general contractor, had a contract with the City of Portsmouth for repairs and improvements to the City’s sanitary sewer system. Hunt subcontracted a part of the work at the Race Street pumping station to T.A. Sheets, a mechanical contractor. Sheets’ responsibility at the Race Street…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. S. L. Nusbaum & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Johnson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. White v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sting Security, Inc. v. First Mercury Syndicate, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1992
  2. Sentinel Associates v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  3. Factory Mutual Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
  4. Marshall v. FairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Admiral Insurance v. G4S Youth ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API