Peart v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPER, J. pro tem. *
Appellants and other owners of land in unincorporated territory of Santa Clara County filed a petition with the board of supervisors of that county for the incorporation of a new city to be known as the city of South San Jose. It is conceded that the petition complied with the statutory provisions for organization of new cities. (Gov. Code, §§ 34300-34332.) After hearings upon the petition, respondent board excluded from the proposed city much of the land described in the petition for incorporation, with the result that the boundaries of the proposed city included less…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curtis v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- City Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Simi Valley Recreation & Park District v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.