Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Steele v. Steele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

THIS was an issue joined on the facts alledged in a libel for a divorce; and, upon the trial, the Chief Justice observed, that notice ought to be given of the facts intended to be proved under the general allegations of the libel.

1Opinion of the Court

Rush, Justice;

I think it would be most convenient to give notice, that between two specific dates, acts of cruelty &c. were intended to be proved.

The Court seemed to adopt that idea, and recommended it; for the future practice of the bar.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tilton v. BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. Chien v. Kollar-KotellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. Dang v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. Emmanuel Lopez v. County of San Joaquin, a California municipal corporation; City of Stockton, a California municipal corporation; Peter Devencenzi; Genevieve Vallotton; Phirun VarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API