Faison v. . Hardy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was au aitkal from an order, in a cause ponding in NortjiamptoN Superior Court, made by Plokej J., in Cihambers, by consent, at Halifax, on May 24, 18915, continuing the restraining order until the hearing, and from which ruling the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
MacRae, J.:
Passing by the long statement of-facts leading up to the matters in controversy, it appears that in 1876 the Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company conveyed certain- lands by deed in fee-simple to John W. Faison, and said Faison, to secure the payment of certain notes representing the purchase-money tor said land, conveyed the same land to Caldwell Hardy, as trustee; said notes aré now the property of C. W. Grandy & Sons, and at their instance the said Hardy has advertised said hind for sale under the provisions of said deed of trust.
The plaintiff, F. S. Faison, seeks by this action to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whittaker v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Hamilton v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- McNair v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Isler v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Caldwell v. StirewaltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Meeker v. FairfieldColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Hamilton v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Pearce Brothers & Co. v. ElwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Washington Water Power Co. v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Buena Vista Gold Mines Co. v. Boise Basin Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.