Legal Opinion
United States v. Broverman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 25, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendants move to dismiss all counts of a five-count indictment on the ground that no count charges an offense against the United States.
The first two counts charge violation of section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 5 (b), and regulations issued thereunder in that, on two separate occasions, the defendants wilfully imported a quantity of hog bristles, the country of origin of which was China (other than Formosa).
The third and fourth counts charge that with respect to the foregoing importations, the defendants wilfully made false…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Russian Volunteer Fleet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Karrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Yoshida International, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Yoshida International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- United States v. Joe Quong, Joe Wing Fong and Joe Wing WahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Hausler v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- H. Grant Heaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.