Legal Opinion

H. Grant Heaton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1965No. 19689PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was convicted under an indictment charging that on December 2, 1959, in San Francisco, California, he willfully and knowingly imported merchandise “the country of origin of which was China (other than Formosa) to-wit: 23 art objects of a value of $23,925.00, without such dealings having been specifically authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury * * * in violation of Section 5(b) of Title 50 App. United States Code, (Trading with The Enemy Act) 31 C.F.R., Section 500.204.”

Section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.App. § 5(b) (1946), permits…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. August Edward Schartner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Gabriel Gurrola-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Cohen v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. John Dolack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Aey, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API