Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Birmingham v. Nagel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 1933No. 6 Div. 399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action on a’ promissory note executed on December 12, 1929, by the appellee and Nagel Sales & Engr. Co., payable “in gold coin of the United States of the present standard of weight and fineness” to the Bank of Ensley (Ramsay & McCormack, Inc.) or order, on the 11th day of January, 1930, and payable at said bank.

' The defendant pleaded the general issue, in short by consent, with leave to give in evidence any matter that would bar a recovery, if specially pleaded.

The evidence shows that the note was indorsed and delivered to the plaintiff bank as collateral to secure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowenstein & Bros. v. BreslerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. J. F. Morgan Paving Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Williams v. CostelloSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Bibb v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glover v. HuddlestonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API