Gibson v. Casto

Judge Harold R. Banke.

Robert Gibson, in his capacity as executor of the estate of his mother, Mary Y. Gibson, sued Mary Gibson’s insurer, Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company (“Preferred Risk”) and Philip Casto, an attorney Preferred Risk retained to represent Mary Gibson. Robert Gibson appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Casto and Preferred Risk, enumerating three errors.

This case arose in the wake of a March 4, 1990 collision between vehicles driven by Mary Gibson and Rhonda Holder. Mary Gibson sustained serious injuries in the wreck. Although Preferred Risk…