Legal Opinion

Maze v. Langford

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1911No. Civ. No. 826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. P. P. Gosbey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, in an action for damages against the sheriff of Santa Clara county and his surety, for turning over to one E. Y. Burke $500 belonging to the plaintiff.

The salient facts of the case are as follows: E. V. Burke, on May 8, 1908, obtained a judgment against E. R. Maze, the plaintiff herein, for the sum of $500 and costs. On the same day Burke procured to be issued thereon a writ of execution, directed to the defendant Langford as sheriff, commanding him to satisfy the said judgment out of the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tibbet v. SueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Yuen v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. BeyerleinMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Maze v. LangfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API