Legal Opinion

Protests 984251-G of Danbury & Bethel Pur Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided May 28, 1942No. 47262PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It appeared that the merchandise consisted of clippings or cuttings which accumulate in the factories that manufacture garments made of beaver skins. The issue herein turned apparently on the question of the size and quality of the fur pieces involved in the shipments. The plaintiff’s witness, associated with the plaintiff company, testified that his duties were “to advise and examine all purchases that came in, all raw furs or dressed furs, that were to be used in the manufacture of hatters’ furs”; that he had examined the bags in each of these shipments, and that to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Coppersmith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Hannel & Bennet v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API