Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 1, 1959No. C.D. 2088Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar, invoiced as “Jap Mink Waste,” was classified for duty under paragraph 1519(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under the provision therein for “Dressed furs and dressed fur skins * * * Other: * * * dyed.” Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly classifiable under paragraph 1555 of the act, as modified by the Tor-quay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739, at the rate of 4 per centum ad valorem as “Waste, not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Protests 984251-G of Danbury & Bethel Pur Co.United States Customs Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API