Scheipers v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Following a bench trial, Guy Scheipers was found guilty of having a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10 grams or more within three hours after driving or being in actual physical control of a vehicle. See OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (5). Scheipers contends in his sole enumeration of error that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction because the machine used to test his breath has a 0.010 margin of error. We disagree and affirm his conviction.
The evidence shows that Scheipers was given a breathalyzer test on an Intoximeter 5000 machine following his arrest for driving…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lattarulo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Newton v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Lanier v. City of ManchesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Totino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Bagwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Cawthon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998